Steven Bendel triumphant against the ATO
On 19 February 2025, the Full Federal Court decided that unpaid present entitlements are not 'loans' for Division 7A purposes.
Here’s our practical analysis of the top 5 technical aspects of Bendel:
(1) Clients who have been subjected to additional tax, penalties and/or interest for years under audit, objection or dispute since FY2010 must revisit those assessments and decisions, and likely lodge tax objections. There are still some steps to play out in the coming weeks and months, but historical decisions are likely untenable. Act now.
(2) Clients who followed the ATO's guidance since 2010 likely won't get much love from the decision. They were corralled into establishing loans or sub-trusts. If you're in that boat, don't expect ATO refunds any time soon albeit you were likely materially disadvantaged from following the guidance.
(3) Those who are deep into FY24 lodgment time, or FY25 tax planning, should be careful to consider sub-division EA and EB (s 109XA onwards). UPEs can still be subjected to Division 7A consequences and for most private groups, we would have thought that they will continue to be captured as "benefits leave the trust". Those rules are very specific though. Just be careful. There are different ways to skin a cat.
(4) Clients' costs of capital/funding have fallen now that they are not required to pay interest on certain unpaid present entitlements.
(5) ATO edicts are not the law.
|